The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This kind of elusive, this sort of, what is it called? I think it's called like a cat string. Like if you play with a cat and you move the string away, they'll keep reaching, but you throw the string on the ground, they're like, they're totally uninterested in it. Is that what's going on? 'Cause that's a dopaminergic phenomenon, the cat string example.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.