Andrew Huberman· PhD
If you come in poorly hydrated, then you maybe need to go more like 12, but here's the deal. If you start off a session in a bad spot, you're not going to catch back up. Like you just, you're in trouble.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you come in poorly hydrated, then you maybe need to go more like 12, but here's the deal. If you start off a session in a bad spot, you're not going to catch back up. Like you just, you're in trouble.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.