The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the early Mark of insulin resistance the canary in the coal mine is not an increase in glucose it's an increase in insulin so normal glycemia with hyperinsulinemia especially postprandial meaning after you eat hyperinsulinemia is the thing that tells you hey you're five ten years away from this being a real problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that is post prandial hyperinsulinemia which is a harbinger to insulin resistance and look he might be five years away from being insulin resistant but that's exactly the time I'd like to be able to to intervene
and so before you see that elevated level of glucose you will actually see an elevated level of insulin so postprandial hyperinsulinemia is the metabolic harbinger of all this stuff