The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
IGF-1 that is released directly due to growth hormone signaling-- usually, the growth hormone comes from the pituitary and binds to the liver where usually, it has a half life of about a week, where the paracrine or autocrine-- think of it as like the peripherally acting or acting in the muscles itself, which is also helpful-- is released and is not as concerning because it's not related to insulin resistance, but it is related to the training itself.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.