The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there are many examples myself included of people who are metabolically healthy who have carbohydrates in their diet and do not develop insulin resistance even the dreaded fructose in whole food form i'm not going to go eating fructose in the form of sucrose table sugar but i don't fear fructose and fruit i don't fear fructose and honey
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in honey in fruit a whole food matrix carbohydrate even if it's a simple carbohydrate that contains fructose doesn't appear to be harmful for humans metabolically whereas a simple carbohydrate in isolation sucrose coca-cola fake honey these do in both human and animal models
just because honey contains fructose or fruit contains fructose those do not perform the same physiologically and animal or human models as isolated fructose or fructose and glucose disaccharide as sucrose in human studies
I think that processed sugar looks to be problematic for humans but fruit and honey not so problematic so excess carbohydrates is dependent on the details right are you eating processed sugar high fructose corn syrup and we talked earlier in the podcast people can rewind to that about how those are different and a little bit of literature around that but honey is not the same as fruit the honey is not the same as processed sugar fruit is not the same as processed sugar