The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
monozygotic is from an embryo split because of the IVF process likely putting the embryo in the catheter maybe having that you know outer surface touched predisposes it to splitting after you put it into the body so more identical twins two to 3% chance of monozygotic twins with IVF or the natural chance is .3%
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.