The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Look at my crow's feet there that's this is like a year old but we've done a pretty good job and that's part of the it's probably from uh caloric restriction and facial fat loss during the you know the first half of the protocol because we're going you know level one two three so you're gonna lose that fat and initially as you induce caloric restriction progressively and then uh yeah once you reach the end the end point you can start restoring the volume
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.