Bryan Johnson· Author
And then the frequency that you know, if you do one session per week, it's not as good as as if you're doing them in proximity.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then the frequency that you know, if you do one session per week, it's not as good as as if you're doing them in proximity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But the studies show that the gains accumulate over time, not in the beginning.
People often times make the mistake where their sessions are spread out too far apart. They need to be within some kind of constrained time frame for the benefits to accumulate.