The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it was like post 911 a lot of the workers selling that the World Trade Center um pits because that's what was left um sadly were uh developed cancers right probably from exposure to those kinds of things well I mean I would argue it's also the fuels just the unbelievable amount of pollution microlution that was in the air following those things I mean that's devastating stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.