The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a chest abdomen pelvis CT scan is probably I mean look there's probably a scanner out there now that's moving fast enough that it's much lower but I'll give you an example okay remember how I talked about we do CT angiograms on all of our patients for coronary artery disease — an off-the-shelf scanner for this is 20 Ms of radiation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.