Andrew Huberman· PhD
They will do things like putting on a hoodie or wearing a hat for instance, to restrict their visual window. And indeed that works quite well
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
They will do things like putting on a hoodie or wearing a hat for instance, to restrict their visual window. And indeed that works quite well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I actually used to read papers. Maybe I need to go back to this. I put a like a baseball cap on, put a hoodie on, and you restrict your visual world. And it makes perfect sense if in fact involuntary attention which presumably comes from the periphery >> right >> is inexhaustible >> right >> so you know I think what's interesting about the digital interface that we exist in now is that the whole world is brought right in front of us