The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But I do think that this this idea of um this insight that we're unique in our ability to learn from things long ago, stamp down things now that people could potentially learn from um not just in the present but in the future is incredible.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Uh and we sort of stand on the shoulders of gi giants. We humans because we can we can read people's thoughts that are thousands of years old literally.