Andrew Huberman· PhD
And so this is the biological age test, we have developed it, it's a simple mouth swab.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And so this is the biological age test, we have developed it, it's a simple mouth swab.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Our latest paper is out - a new method called "TIME-Seq" to measure biological age for just a few dollars.
Our latest paper reduces the cost of reading DNA methylation to generate age clocks 100-fold.
The student in my lab, you know Patrick Griffin, he spent his PhD trying to figure out how to make it cheap. And he figured it out, we've just put a paper online. Viewers can go and download that, it's at a site called bioRxiv, Sinclair, Griffin, keyword TIME-Seq, S-E-Q. That paper is describing a way to do this methylation clock for 1,000 times less.