Paul Saladino· MD
when we break from what our human biology is expecting and has been presented with for the last 350,000 years of homo sapian Evolution and millions of years of prominant evolution we don't do well
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we break from what our human biology is expecting and has been presented with for the last 350,000 years of homo sapian Evolution and millions of years of prominant evolution we don't do well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But I think most of what we're working with in terms of our technology and what's inside these bodies is 10, 15, 20, 150, 250,000 years old. So we have this discordance in the way that we're living and what this elegant machine that all of us inhabit is expecting.