The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
why wouldn't I want to further optimize the quality of the egg and the sperm, because the quality of the egg and the sperm ultimately are going to determine not just whether or not you have a successful pregnancy but are going to determine, admittedly in ways that will forever remain cryptic to you-- but nonetheless are going to be important in determining the qualities of the brain tissue and body tissue of your offspring.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And I do think that even if people are not wishing to conceive more children that the information related to fertility and optimizing egg and sperm health is of value in the sense that optimizing egg and sperm health can be used as a proxy for optimizing our body and brain health generally.