David Sinclair· PhD
A @NatureAging study from 2023 showed similar results - the 143 who cut their calories slowed their pace of aging by 2-3% over the 2-year study using the DunedinPACE measure, a DNAm-based “speedometer”
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A @NatureAging study from 2023 showed similar results - the 143 who cut their calories slowed their pace of aging by 2-3% over the 2-year study using the DunedinPACE measure, a DNAm-based “speedometer”
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Healthy people who reduced their caloric intake 25% became epigenetically younger, based on the DunedinPACE of aging clock, and the effects were seen in a year