Andrew Huberman· PhD
cerebellar atexia is what the neurologists call it and it can happen not just with cerebellar damage but damage to the tracks that feed the information into the cerebellum. >> Exactly. or output from the cerebellum.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
cerebellar atexia is what the neurologists call it and it can happen not just with cerebellar damage but damage to the tracks that feed the information into the cerebellum. >> Exactly. or output from the cerebellum.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The typical thing would be um a patient who has a cerebellar stroke or a tumor for example um might be um not that steady on their feet. You know if if the uh you know dynamics of the situation you're standing on a on a street car with your with no pole to hold on to. They might not be as good at adjusting all the little movements of the car. um you know there's a kind of tremor that can occur as they're reaching for things um because they reach a little too far and then they overcorrect and come back uh things like that.