The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what I've done is I've just taken cat 6 cable and put on adapters so I can run my cell phone and my computer on ethernet instead of using Wi-Fi in my house why I'm still not convinced that RF EMF so radio frequency EMF which is a lot like what comes out of your microwave is safe for humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I don't want emfs so yeah there's no Wi-Fi at my house which means that if you ever come to my house like if you come to the Gathering in Costa Rica Memorial day of this year 2025 in details are at the abrf ororgani cables to my computer and my phone
you can take an ethernet cable plug it directly into your computer it's much more stable than Wi-Fi and then depending what we think about how Wi-Fi is affecting human physiology you have no RF EMF you can also do it with your iPhone