The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's oftentimes you know challenging because the immediacy of human concerns is typically in the realm of seconds then you know in minutes and then in hours but then once you get to days like the level of interest just kind of like falls off a cliff in terms of what's immediately important to people and that's just how we're biologically configured. It's how society's configured. A lot of it is cultural norms but a lot of it is our biology
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.