Andrew Huberman· PhD
And what's remarkable about these studies is that the entire duration of the therapy is just one to three minutes, done just a few times per week.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And what's remarkable about these studies is that the entire duration of the therapy is just one to three minutes, done just a few times per week.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we did that for 3 minutes and originally we did that every day for an hour. I open not not very little difference because the long wavelength light passes through the lid without it being affected very much. So I said to people, whatever you're comfortable with, you're doing me a favor. You're being a subject in my experiment. I'm not paying you for it. You want to keep your eyes closed, you keep your eyes closed. And those people all had an improvement in their color vision.
So instead of doing it every day for so many days, we just did it for one day and 3 minutes of that light one day and we brought them back. I think it was an hour later that it all improved.