Bryan Johnson· Author
Um, but you know theoretically to at some point to not die at some point we have we have to continue to slow that process right so more still needs to happen in order to not have a cliff at some point in the future.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Um, but you know theoretically to at some point to not die at some point we have we have to continue to slow that process right so more still needs to happen in order to not have a cliff at some point in the future.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I liken this to get getting to the edge of a cliff. And you wrote this in the book, is that we've been far too often working on trying to understand why we falling off a cliff at the end of life, without even asking the question, "What brings us to the edge of that cliff in the first place."