Andrew Huberman· PhD
so it's probably that as we are aging we are undergoing more DNA damage and um or at a minimum the DNA damage we're undergoing is less amenable to repair
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so it's probably that as we are aging we are undergoing more DNA damage and um or at a minimum the DNA damage we're undergoing is less amenable to repair
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Responses to damage may cause aging.
DNA damage which is known to accelerate the aging process and can lead to cancer
So, DNA damage does cause aging of all tissues in the body.