Andrew Huberman· PhD
I mean, you're talking about this pear-shaped structure, where the neurons that generate fear are cheek to jowl with the neurons that generate offensive aggression of all things.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean, you're talking about this pear-shaped structure, where the neurons that generate fear are cheek to jowl with the neurons that generate offensive aggression of all things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what they found was that sometimes lesioning or disrupting the neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus would make animals or people hyperphagic they would want to eat like crazy and other lesions in other individuals or animals would make them anorexic it would make them not want to eat at all it would make food aversive so that means that the ventromedial hypothalamus is definitely an interesting control station for hunger and feeding and satiety but it doesn't really tell you what's going on at a deeper level in fact it's a little bit confusing or paradoxical turns out that there are multiple population of neurons in there some are promoting feeding and some are promoting not feeding or not eating