The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What I said is that if you use cannabis once, then the sperm that are generated in the 60 days after that cannabis use are going to have a higher incidence of disrupted motility and perhaps morphology as well. Remember, sperm are continually generated every 60 days or so.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's also you know other data that shows really a null effect and I think that it's it goes into probably the composition how men are taking it the frequency because a lot of that data is not well teased out in a lot of these studies
the uh kind of invitro stuff definitely would suggest that some of the animal stuff as well the human stuff is definitely a bit mixed
so all the different things right right this is so very different than looking at for instance um ovarian reserve like the the number of eggs where you use ultrasound and you