The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you artificially stimulate these neurons so prevent that drop from ever happening just stimulate them continually the muscle just sit there and eat so you can't fully separate although we like to make this distinction between repetitive and consummatory and we know that that that in different parts of the brain there's more important for one versus the other the reality is the entire behavior is linked and you can't fully separate them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.