David Sinclair· PhD
DNA amplification (PCR) tests could be falsely positive for #COVID19 if there’s lingering viral genetic material after the disease has subsided or from cross contamination in the lab.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
DNA amplification (PCR) tests could be falsely positive for #COVID19 if there’s lingering viral genetic material after the disease has subsided or from cross contamination in the lab.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
PCR tests are very sensitive and can give a positive if there’s lingering viral RNA in recovered patients or simply a cross contamination of samples.
8. PCR tests are so sensitive they can theoretically pick up a single #coronavirus particle. As we will see, this is good news and bad...