The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the things that happens in conflict is we have confirmation bias that's a cognitive framework that is often present in situations of emotional conflict of conflict which involves always something an emotional Dimension could be political too confirmation by means that I am looking for evidence that reinforces my beliefs and I disregard any evidence that contradicts it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.