Andrew Huberman· PhD
we don't have biomarkers around true metrics of Aging everything we have to date stinks
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we don't have biomarkers around true metrics of Aging everything we have to date stinks
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Someday soon -- likely very soon -- we'll find it funny (and a little bit sad) that we used to measure aging in years.
actually we don't really have any good biomarkers for aging