Andrew Huberman· PhD
The biggest um set of results that supported this hypothesis were adoption and pedigree studies.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The biggest um set of results that supported this hypothesis were adoption and pedigree studies.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So if you have an adoptive parent who's addicted to alcohol, you are more likely to have many sexual partners. And you're also more likely to be diagnosed with conduct disorder or um be arrested for a violent crime even if you were never raised by that parent. And it's not just substance use to substance use or violence to violence or you know risky sexual behavior to risky sexual behavior. It seems that having a family history of any of these things increases your likelihood of manifesting any one of them.