The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the reason they didn't observe it was not because they were bad scientists, but they made a mistake they weren't aware of, which is they created a little hole in the skull in order to image the movement of the dye in the brain, and they didn't close that hole in the skull with a lens or something else to keep the pressure in. So all the pressure was gone, so the lymph couldn't move along at all.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.