The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in uh uh another experiment where we take animals and they're living in groups — and we rank them all and then we rehouse them so everybody has a rank that they start with then we put all the alphas together put all the betas together Etc so that everybody forms a new rank then you have animals that went up a rank went down a rank or stayed the same for every group and so that's something that we're looking at right now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.