We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think what you're what you're speaking to, Brian, is this this concept of objective measurement in place of a subjective um sensation of health. And, you know, we see this all throughout the influencer community, but also in medicine as well, where sort of subjective health is touted as um a marker that we should for some reason track, which is ridiculous.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.