The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
why does this matter because if we are going to create a vaccine to coronavirus it's probably going to be to one of the surface proteins like the s protein so we would want to know how quickly the s protein is mutating or any of the proteins on the surface of coronavirus there are not many may be changing in order to get a sense of how effective a vaccine may be if we make a vaccine to an S protein and the S protein mutates the vaccine may not be very effective
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.