Andrew Huberman· PhD
The first is that you should be tracking things, because one measurement isn't enough. These things vary and over time.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The first is that you should be tracking things, because one measurement isn't enough. These things vary and over time.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Measure your biomarkers Identify problems early when they're more easily addressable. Discover areas for improvement. Use data to inform your lifestyle choices.
And so by doing these measurements it really helps you figure out like where to focus