The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this particular technology was shown to change genetic expression so you're not just looking it's not a um like a Botox or a filler you're actually changing genetic expression with this therapy yeah you know massively reverses uh collagen loss in the uh in the domus as well which drops about 50 from age 20 to 80 for a type 1 and type 3 and the ratio as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.