Paul Saladino· MD
In terms of mW/m2, airpods do seem a lot like being a few feet from a microwave for hours (?) per day.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In terms of mW/m2, airpods do seem a lot like being a few feet from a microwave for hours (?) per day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
watch this both airpods and wireless headphones emit massive amounts of emfs massive amounts of radio frequency electromagnetic fields that are going straight through your brain and into your body for hours a day
yes if you have a 2.4 GHz Bluetooth signal and you're a finance bro and you got them in all day and you're taking all the calls of course that's not ideal um but most people who do that they also have their phone in their pocket or on their body um so that's like a a negative you know times two where if you use the Bluetooth or use any headphones to try and get the phone away from you as far as possible you could argue that that might be a net positive
watch this both airpods and wireless headphones emit massive amounts of emfs massive amounts of radio frequency electromagnetic fields that are going straight through your brain and into your body for hours a day