Andrew Huberman· PhD
if you want a monkey to like you you have to give an affiliative facial gesture which is not a smile that's actually an aggressive gesture so as Karen Dr Parker just showed you it's lip smacking
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you want a monkey to like you you have to give an affiliative facial gesture which is not a smile that's actually an aggressive gesture so as Karen Dr Parker just showed you it's lip smacking
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so if you go to the zoo folks and you look directly at a monkey and you smile that's a threat if you want to be friendly with the monkeys lip smack it's an affiliation thing