Peter Attia· MD
I kind of think this NAD stuff is noise at the moment
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I kind of think this NAD stuff is noise at the moment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
which says look we know the answer to this or at least we're going to postulate that the answer is of course NAD is going down with age um and whether or not that's causal or not giving more NAD is going to be a better thing okay so what do the data have to say and again this is an area where I mean there is a remarkably booming industry around the uh administration of NAD and its precursors um and it's actually surprising how little data is is out there so so what I thought I would do is try to highlight perhaps the most promising data I could see and and and hopefully by sharing why that's not so promising or why that's really really small um you might be um convinced of my view which I should have said at the outset is I kind of think this NAD stuff is noise at the moment
I don't personally believe there is enough evidence to to think that NAD precursors as are being marketed today are likely to benefit most people some people probably people who have um conditions of disregulated NAD could get a benefit
I don't personally believe there is enough evidence to to think that NAD precursors as they are being marketed today are likely to benefit most people some people probably people who have um conditions of disregulated NAD could get a benefit