We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Uh that I should eat and then he should eat. Um or that we could eat alongside one another different food. Although I confess I often fed him steak. Um, if it was appropriate food for a bulldog, I fed it to him. Uh it as opposed to letting him eat before me because of this access to resources thing. Is there any truth to that?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.