The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but in 2015 we made an observation that some of these cells anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3 of these cells it depends on like the type of a systems that you use to identify they were contacting directly the nervous system and that brought up a a a new dimension of how it is that the gut could be could be communicating to the brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we thought for the longest time that these cells were not connecting directly to the nervous system that they will release these neuromodulators and the neuromodulators through diffusion will act on receptors into some of the nerve Terminals and that is true that is a very well established uh system
he named uh the diffus endocrine system of the gut and then he came up with this word enteroendocrine cell and these cells are dispar at a ratio of roughly speaking like 1 to 1,000 epithelial uh cells throughout the digestive tract