The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he said, you know, we think we know how other people feel, but we really have no idea how other people feel unless we ask them. In fact, most of the time we don't even really know how we feel. We're not very good at gauging our own emotions.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in reality um most people are terrible at understanding how they themselves feel let alone someone else's intentions