The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it behooves you to pay a little bit more to go to a really good place that can do that scan for 2 m cevers meaning they have a much faster CT scanner much better software and they're better Engineers so they have better engineering that they can do on the scanner to get that done
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
do not get a CT scan or any Imaging study without asking how much radiation am I seeing and if a person can't tell you how many MTS of radiation you're being exposed to then just say I'm I'm going to wait a minute until somebody can tell me that