The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so when we shut off uh the cells uh the animal and as I usually say like became blind to the sugars because it's kind of like uh a keing to having turn off the cells that are able to detect light the wav length of light for us to be able to discern color right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we were able to put these opsins and bring the light and shut off these cells very rapidly when we had presented the animal with a choice of sweetener over sugar then all of a sudden the animal became blind to the solutions it couldn't discern between the the the stevia so to speak or the sweetener from the actual sugar
and it's not that the animal is losing its memory because then you if you remove the light and now the the cells are functional again then the animal again is able to distinguish one solution over over the other