The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
many of the treatments for trauma, EMDR, nowadays there's a lot of excitement also about ketamine therapies, exposure therapies, you know, like cognitive behavioral therapies involve not just trying to reduce the amount of emotion associated with a memory, but also a deliberate speeding up or slowing down of that memory.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What's eventually going to happen ideally with good treatment is that the emotional weight of the experience will eventually be divorced from the memory of the experience. And that's done again by trying to reduce the amount of emotional activation during the recall of that experience and one of the best ways to do that is to alter the rate of the memory playback.
In other words, taking that firing of neurons that might've been one, two, three, four, again, it would be much more complicated, but one, two, three, four for the car crash and getting the memory to play back at a rate of one, two, three, four, or even one, two, three, four, one two three four.