The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
showing the correlation between the incidence or the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration on the y-axis and the the average polyunsaturated oil consumption in grams per day on the x-axis and um again the Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.78 which is a pretty strong correlated correlation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are more countries where there's more age-related macular degeneration than you would expect rather than countries where there's less age-related macular degeneration for any given amount of polyunsaturated fat consumption