Andrew Huberman· PhD
Can we wheel them all in for breakfast and actually have a heat source, an incandescent heat source >> to provide incandescent light, but at the same time use that heat.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Can we wheel them all in for breakfast and actually have a heat source, an incandescent heat source >> to provide incandescent light, but at the same time use that heat.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but that energy is going into the room they're heating your house and all of those infrared photons are going into your body so this idea of energy maxing or Energy Efficiency with this lumens per watt standard is harming humans
incandescents in my opinion are the best form of lighting they're the the healthiest light that you can buy I think they're healthier than like purely red LEDs as well and that's because they are rich in infrared light they have a spectrum of light almost identical to a fire to a candle
I think that's powerful and I think it's really accessible to a lot of people and I love it like i' I've just changed over I'm an incandescent like maximalist at this point
And incandescence also have a spectrum of visible light that is much more like what we see outside. It's not exact, but it's much better. Incandescence also have some degree of infrared.