David Sinclair· PhD
If aging is a software problem, as @davidasinclair and I advocate, it will be much easier to reverse than if aging is the result of passive damage accumulation.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
If aging is a software problem, as @davidasinclair and I advocate, it will be much easier to reverse than if aging is the result of passive damage accumulation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Cool new paper: Cellular aging biomarkers in primates - increasingly supportive of aging being a software problem But what kind of software? And can an update be reinstalled? 🧵 https://t.co/1CKLNtHwZ4
New article by @jpsenescence presenting the case for aging being a software problem.
The study suggests that aging is like scratches on a CD that can be polished off, or like corrupted software that can be reinstalled to reverse aging, as described in Lifespan 4/n