The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And then all of a sudden they develop like a very strong sexual compulsion or they gain 30 pounds because they're just eating and eating and eating and it's like, you know, the the underlying diiathesis, whatever it is, has found a new phenotypic expression because it was never actually resolved.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because of the problem of cross addiction where when people give up one addictive substance or behavior they are vulnerable to switch that addictive tendency over to another substance or behavior