Andrew Huberman· PhD
And then you get there and it's closed, or they're not letting any more people in, well then the dopamine level drops way below what it was before you told them that you were headed there.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And then you get there and it's closed, or they're not letting any more people in, well then the dopamine level drops way below what it was before you told them that you were headed there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Then, there's also the case in which we predict that something good will happen, when that happens, there's an increase in dopamine just as it was before, but then if that thing doesn't happen, for instance, our friends don't show up for dinner, then there's a drop in dopamine below our initial baseline. That drop in dopamine, is the chemical essence of what we call, disappointment.
But then if that thing doesn't happen, for instance, our friends don't show up for dinner, then there's a drop in dopamine below our initial baseline. That drop in dopamine is the chemical essence of what we call disappointment.
it's going to send signals to alter the circuitry in a way that says whatever you did to get there don't do it again it's going to discourage you