Paul Saladino· MD
in humans there's really never been a study showing that neu5gc or the antibodies that we generate against neu5gc which are known as anti neu5gc are problematic
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in humans there's really never been a study showing that neu5gc or the antibodies that we generate against neu5gc which are known as anti neu5gc are problematic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
animals like humans that are rich in new 5gc so that is something that is a very good model they say
it's essentially there's no problem eating new 5gc containing foods nor is there any evidence in the medical literature that anti-nu5gc antibodies in humans as demonstrated by the rabbit studies are harmful